New technology, psychiatry, and the law: Panic, prudence, possibility.

Journal: International journal of law and psychiatry

Volume: 94

Issue: 

Year of Publication: 

Affiliated Institutions:  Department of Psychiatry, Trinity College Dublin, Trinity Centre for Health Sciences, Tallaght University Hospital, Tallaght, Dublin D NRA, Ireland. Electronic address: brendan.kelly@tcd.ie.

Abstract summary 

Throughout human history, all new technology has been met with surprise, anxiety, panic, and - eventually - prudent adoption of certain aspects of specific technological advances. This pattern is evident in the histories of most technologies, ranging from steam power in the nineteenth century, to television in the twentieth century, and - now - 'artificial intelligence' (AI) in the twenty-first century. Each generation believes that the technological advances of its era are quantitatively and qualitatively different to those of previous generations, but the underlying phenomenon is the same: the shock of the new, followed by more gradual adjustment to (and of) new technology. These concerns are apparent today in relation to AI, which reflects interesting but incremental advances on existing technologies, rather than stand-alone developments. The usual concerns with all technologies (e.g., that they will replace certain aspects of human function) are, perhaps, more concerning in fields such as mental capacity law, which often applies to people with impaired decision-making capacity who might be especially vulnerable to technologies which appear capable of encroaching disproportionately on decision-making or other areas of core human function. This paper approaches this topic from an historical standpoint, noting both previous technological panics in the past and the possibilities offered by AI today, provided it is approached in a proportionate, prudent, and person-centered way, underpinned by appropriate ethical guidance and active ethical awareness in clinical and legal practice.

Authors & Co-authors:  Kelly

Study Outcome 

Source Link: Visit source

Statistics
Citations : 
Authors :  1
Identifiers
Doi : 10.1016/j.ijlp.2024.101984
SSN : 1873-6386
Study Population
Male,Female
Mesh Terms
Other Terms
Artificial intelligence;Ethics;Human rights;Legislation;Psychiatry;Technology
Study Design
Study Approach
Quantitative,Qualitative
Country of Study
Publication Country
Netherlands