Factors and Processes Facilitating Recovery from Coercion in Mental Health Services-A Meta-Ethnography.

Journal: Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland)

Volume: 12

Issue: 6

Year of Publication: 

Affiliated Institutions:  Psychiatric Research Unit, Psychiatry Region Zealand, Slagelse, Denmark. School of Psychology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece. Department for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy I, Faculty of Medicine, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany. Mental Health and Psychiatric Nursing Florence Nightingale Nursing Faculty, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, Turkey. Department of Psychology, Faculty of Languages and History-Geography, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey. Mental Health and Psychiatric Nursing Department, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey. Department of Psychoanalysis and Clinical Consulting, University of Ghent, Gent, Belgium. Department of Biomedical, Metabolic, and Neural Science, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.

Abstract summary 

Being subjected to or witnessing coercive measures in mental health services can have a negative impact on service users, carers and professionals, as they most often are experienced as dehumanising and traumatic. Coercion should be avoided, but when it does happen, it is important to understand how the experience can be processed so that its consequences are managed.A systematic review and meta-ethnography was used to synthesise findings from qualitative studies that examined service users', staff's and relatives' experiences of recovery from being exposed to coercive measures in mental health care settings. We identified, extracted and synthesised, across 23 studies, the processes and factors that were interpreted as significant to process the experience.Recovery from coercion is dependent on a complex set of conditions that support a sense of dignity and respect, a feeling of safety and empowerment. Being in a facilitating environment, receiving appropriate information and having consistent reciprocal communication with staff are the means through which these conditions can be achieved. People employ strategies to achieve recovery, both during and after coercion, to minimise its impact and process the experience.The findings point to the importance of mental health care settings offering recovery-oriented environments and mental health professionals employing recovery-oriented practices, that would empower service users to develop strategies for managing their mental distress as well as their experiences in mental health care in a way that minimises traumatisation and fosters recovery.

Authors & Co-authors:  Berring Georgaca Hirsch Bilgin Akik Aydin Verbeke Galeazzi Vanheule Bertani

Study Outcome 

Source Link: Visit source

Statistics
Citations :  Hirsch S., Steinert T. Measures to avoid coercion in psychiatry and their efficacy. Dtsch. Aerzteblatt Online. 2019;116:336. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2019.0336.
Authors :  10
Identifiers
Doi : 628
SSN : 2227-9032
Study Population
Male,Female
Mesh Terms
Other Terms
coercion;debriefing;legal rights;mental health;meta-ethnography;recovery
Study Design
Study Approach
Qualitative
Country of Study
Publication Country
Switzerland