Preoperative Mobile Health Data Improve Predictions of Recovery From Lumbar Spine Surgery.

Journal: Neurosurgery

Volume: 

Issue: 

Year of Publication: 

Affiliated Institutions:  Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri, USA. Department of Psychology and Brain Sciences, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri, USA. Department of Computer Science & Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri, USA. Department of Neurosurgery, Center for Spine Health, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA. Department of Neurosurgery, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, Massachusetts, USA. Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri, USA. Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.

Abstract summary 

Neurosurgeons and hospitals devote tremendous resources to improving recovery from lumbar spine surgery. Current efforts to predict surgical recovery rely on one-time patient report and health record information. However, longitudinal mobile health (mHealth) assessments integrating symptom dynamics from ecological momentary assessment (EMA) and wearable biometric data may capture important influences on recovery. Our objective was to evaluate whether a preoperative mHealth assessment integrating EMA with Fitbit monitoring improved predictions of spine surgery recovery.Patients age 21-85 years undergoing lumbar surgery for degenerative disease between 2021 and 2023 were recruited. For up to 3 weeks preoperatively, participants completed EMAs up to 5 times daily asking about momentary pain, disability, depression, and catastrophizing. At the same time, they were passively monitored using Fitbit trackers. Study outcomes were good/excellent recovery on the Quality of Recovery-15 (QOR-15) and a clinically important change in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Pain Interference 1 month postoperatively. After feature engineering, several machine learning prediction models were tested. Prediction performance was measured using the c-statistic.A total of 133 participants were included, with a median (IQR) age of 62 (53, 68) years, and 56% were female. The median (IQR) number of preoperative EMAs completed was 78 (61, 95), and the median (IQR) number of days with usable Fitbit data was 17 (12, 21). 63 patients (48%) achieved a clinically meaningful improvement in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System pain interference. Compared with traditional evaluations alone, mHealth evaluations led to a 34% improvement in predictions for pain interference (c = 0.82 vs c = 0.61). 49 patients (40%) had a good or excellent recovery based on the QOR-15. Including preoperative mHealth data led to a 30% improvement in predictions of QOR-15 (c = 0.70 vs c = 0.54).Multimodal mHealth evaluations improve predictions of lumbar surgery outcomes. These methods may be useful for informing patient selection and perioperative recovery strategies.

Authors & Co-authors:  Greenberg Frumkin Xu Zhang Javeed Zhang Benedict Botterbush Yakdan Molina Pennicooke Hafez Ogunlade Pallotta Gupta Buchowski Neuman Steinmetz Ghogawala Kelly Goodin Piccirillo Rodebaugh Lu Ray

Study Outcome 

Source Link: Visit source

Statistics
Citations :  Weinstein JN, Tosteson TD, Lurie JD, et al. Surgical versus nonsurgical therapy for lumbar spinal stenosis. New Engl J Med. 2008;358(8):794-810.
Authors :  25
Identifiers
Doi : 10.1227/neu.0000000000002911
SSN : 1524-4040
Study Population
Male,Female
Mesh Terms
Other Terms
Study Design
Study Approach
Country of Study
Publication Country
United States