Perceived Negative Effects of Tic Management Strategies in Adults With Tic Disorders.

Journal: Behavior modification

Volume: 

Issue: 

Year of Publication: 

Affiliated Institutions:  Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI, USA. Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA. Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. Connecticut OCD, Anxiety, and Tic, Greenwich, USA. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA. Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital, Chicago, IL, USA. UCLA Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, Los Angeles, CA, USA. Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, USA. Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA. Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA. Emory University School of Medicine Marcus Center, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Abstract summary 

Behavior therapy is a well-established and empirically supported treatment for tic disorders (TDs). However, concerns have been expressed about the negative effects of behavioral interventions, such as tic worsening, tic substitution, and excessive effort. This study explored perceived negative effects of tic management strategies in adults with TDs and predictors of these experiences. Participants ( = 72) completed semi-structured interviews 11 years after receiving behavior therapy or supportive therapy in a randomized clinical trial. We examined responses to interview questions about managing tics and predictors of reported negative effects. Most participants did not experience tic worsening (84%) or tic substitution (75%) from tic management strategies. The majority felt they could manage tics while participating in their environment (87%) and did not report life interference from tic management (77%). About half (45%) felt less present when managing tics. Treatment non-responders in the original trial were more likely to report negative effects of tic management strategies. No differences in reported negative consequences were found between those who received behavior therapy versus supportive therapy, suggesting that behavior therapy specifically does not lead to such adverse effects. These findings could reduce misconceptions about behavior therapy for TDs and enhance its acceptability and utilization.

Authors & Co-authors:  Barber Pitts Stiede Espil Woods Specht Bennett Walkup Ricketts McGuire Peterson Compton Wilhelm Scahill Piacentini

Study Outcome 

Source Link: Visit source

Statistics
Citations : 
Authors :  15
Identifiers
Doi : 10.1177/01454455241236446
SSN : 1552-4167
Study Population
Male,Female
Mesh Terms
Other Terms
Tourette’s;behavior therapy;habit reversal;tic disorders;tics
Study Design
Study Approach
Country of Study
Publication Country
United States