How has body image been evaluated among people with lower limb loss? A scoping review.

Journal: Disability and rehabilitation

Volume: 

Issue: 

Year of Publication: 

Affiliated Institutions:  Faculty of Health Sciences, Western University, London, Canada. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Parkwood Institute, London, Canada.

Abstract summary 

Lower limb loss can result in an altered body image, leading to changes in self-esteem, mental health and quality of life. This scoping review explored how body image has been evaluated among people with lower limb loss.Five databases (Embase, Medline, PsychINFO, CINHAL, and Nursing and Allied Health Database) were searched from inception until March 19, 2023. Inclusion criteria: 1) people with lower limb loss; 2) evaluated a body image outcome or theme; and 3) a qualitative, quantitative or mixed methods design.Twenty-four quantitative ( = 19 cross-sectional,  = 3 intervention cohort and  = 2 prospective cohort), 2 qualitative and 1 mixed methods design studies were included. The definition of body image varied across studies, with 59% of studies not reporting a conceptual or theoretical definition. People with lower limb loss perceived a more negative body image compared to control groups. In prospective cohort studies, changes in body image over time were inconclusive.People with lower limb loss report a negative body image when compared to other populations. Definitions and understanding of body image changed overtime and varied among studies which may impact introducing interventions to promote positive body image during rehabilitation and beyond in this population.

Authors & Co-authors:  Nugent Joshi Viana Payne Unger Hunter

Study Outcome 

Source Link: Visit source

Statistics
Citations : 
Authors :  6
Identifiers
Doi : 10.1080/09638288.2024.2335646
SSN : 1464-5165
Study Population
Male,Female
Mesh Terms
Other Terms
Amputee;body image;psychological adjustment;rehabilitation;systematic review
Study Design
Study Approach
Quantitative,Qualitative,Mixed Methods
Country of Study
Publication Country
England