Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Quick Delay Questionnaire (C-QDQ) and ecological characteristics of reward-delay impulsivity of adults with ADHD.

Journal: BMC psychiatry

Volume: 24

Issue: 1

Year of Publication: 

Affiliated Institutions:  Peking University Sixth Hospital/Institute of Mental Health, , Beijing, China. Peking University Sixth Hospital/Institute of Mental Health, , Beijing, China. liulupku@bjmu.edu.cn. Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK. Peking University Sixth Hospital/Institute of Mental Health, , Beijing, China. qianqiujin@bjmu.edu.cn.

Abstract summary 

The Quick Delay Questionnaire (QDQ) is a short questionnaire designed to assess delay-related difficulties in adults. This study aimed to examine the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the QDQ (C-QDQ) in Chinese adults, and explore the ecological characteristics of delay-related impulsivity in Chinese adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).Data was collected from 302 adults, including ADHD (n = 209) and healthy controls (HCs) (n = 93). All participants completed the C-QDQ. The convergent validity, internal consistency, retest reliability and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) of the C-QDQ were analyzed. The correlations between C-QDQ and two laboratory measures of delay-related difficulties and Barratt Impulsiveness Scale-11 (BIS-11), the comparison of C-QDQ scores between ADHD subgroups and HCs were also analyzed.The Cronbach's α of C-QDQ was between 0.83 and 0.89. The intraclass correlation coefficient of C-QDQ was between 0.80 and 0.83. The results of CFA of C-QDQ favoured the original two-factor model (delay aversion and delay discounting). Significant positive associations were found between C-QDQ scores and BIS-11 total score and performance on the laboratory measure of delay-related difficulties. Participants with ADHD had higher C-QDQ scores than HCs, and female ADHD reported higher scores on delay discounting subscale than male. ADHD-combined type (ADHD-C) reported higher scores on delay aversion subscale than ADHD-inattention type (ADHD-I).The C-QDQ is a valid and reliable tool to measure delay-related responses that appears to have clinical utility. It can present the delay-related impulsivity of patients with ADHD. Compared to HCs, the level of reward-delay impulsivity was higher in ADHD.

Authors & Co-authors:  Chen Zhang Hong Qiu Zhou Zhao Pan Si Dong Li Wang Liu Sonuga-Barke Qian

Study Outcome 

Source Link: Visit source

Statistics
Citations :  Castellanos FX, Sonuga-Barke EJS, Milham MP, Tannock R. Characterizing cognition in ADHD: beyond executive dysfunction. Trends Cogn Sci. 2006;10:117–23.
Authors :  14
Identifiers
Doi : 10.1186/s12888-024-05706-2
SSN : 1471-244X
Study Population
Female
Mesh Terms
Other Terms
Delay aversion;Delay discounting;Reliability;Validity;attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder
Study Design
Study Approach
Country of Study
Publication Country
England