Screening for psychological difficulties in young children in crisis: complementary cross-cultural validation.

Journal: International health

Volume: 7

Issue: 6

Year of Publication: 2016

Affiliated Institutions:  Epicentre, Nairobi, Kenya Laboratoire de Psychologie Clinique et Psychopathologie (EA ), Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Institut de Psychologie, Paris, France caroline.marquer@gmail.com. Laboratoire de Psychologie Clinique et Psychopathologie (EA ), Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Institut de Psychologie, Paris, France. Université Paris-Sud et Université Paris Descartes, Inserm U, Paris, France Université Paris , Centre Hospitalier Sainte-Anne, Paris Université Paris , Sorbonne Paris Cité, Inserm U, AP-HP, Bobigny, France. Hôpital Sainte-Anne, Paris, France. National Mental Health Program, Ministry of Health, Niamey, Niger. Regional Department of Public Health, Maradi, Niger. Universidad de Los Andes, Bogota, Colombia. Kenya Psychological Association, Nairobi, Kenya. Médecins Sans Frontières, Nairobi, Kenya. Laboratoire de Psychologie Clinique et Psychopathologie (EA ), Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Institut de Psychologie, Paris, France Médecins Sans Frontières, Paris, France Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Hôpital Cochin, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, France. Epicentre, Paris, France.

Abstract summary 

Detection of children's psychological difficulties in crises and low resource settings is challenged by the lack of a validated, rapid and simple tool. We present the results of two confirmatory validations of the Psychological Screening for Young Children aged 3 to 6 years (PSYCa 3-6) scale.We performed cross-cultural validations, assessing the performance of the scale in different contexts. These were conducted in Mathare, Nairobi, Kenya and Buenaventura, Colombia between December 2009 and February 2012. External validity was assessed comparing the PSYCa 3-6 against a clinical interview and the Clinical Global Impression Severity scale (CGI).A total of 160 mothers or caregivers of children 3 to 6 years old in Mathare and 148 in Buenaventura were included in the study. Both demonstrated good concurrent validity (Buenaventura ρ=0.49, p<0.0001; Mathare ρ=0.41, p<0.0001). Inter-rater reliability was found to be acceptable in Buenaventura (intraclass correlation [ICC]=0.69 [0.4-0.84]) and high in Mathare (0.87 [0.75-0.94]).As shown by its validation in diverse contexts, use in other populations may help improve the delivery of mental health care to children in crises and low-resource settings. Additional research on the design and delivery of intervention models for crises remains essential.

Authors & Co-authors:  Marquer Barry Mouchenik Djibo Manzo Trujillo Maza Githaiga Casas Kirubi Marichez Falissard Moro Grais

Study Outcome 

Source Link: Visit source

Statistics
Citations : 
Authors :  13
Identifiers
Doi : 10.1093/inthealth/ihv006
SSN : 1876-3405
Study Population
Mothers
Mesh Terms
Child
Other Terms
Children;Cross cultural validation;Humanitarian emergency;Intervention;Mental health;Screening tool
Study Design
Study Approach
Country of Study
Kenya
Publication Country
England