Interventions for adolescents and adults with psychosis in Africa: a systematic review and narrative synthesis.

Journal: Global mental health (Cambridge, England)

Volume: 9

Issue: 

Year of Publication: 

Affiliated Institutions:  Institute for Life Course Health Research, Department of Global Health, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa. Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria. Department of Community Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria. Centre for Child and Adolescent Mental Health, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria. Research Support Centre, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe. London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK. University of Makeni, Makeni, Sierra Leone. International Centre for Evidence in Disability, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK. CBM Global Disability Inclusion, Laudenbach, Germany. Centre for Global Mental Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

Abstract summary 

The Global Burden of Disease attributable to psychotic disorders in African countries is high and has increased sharply in recent years. Yet, there is a scarcity of evidence on effective, appropriate and acceptable interventions for schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders on the continent.We carried out a systematic review and narrative synthesis of peer-reviewed literature evaluating the impact of non-pharmacological interventions for adolescents and adults (10-65 years) in African countries. Two reviewers independently double-screened all articles and performed data extraction and quality appraisal using standardized tools.Of the 8529 unique texts returned by our search, 12 studies were identified for inclusion, from seven countries: Egypt, Ethiopia, Ghana, Kenya, Nigeria, South Africa and Sudan. They evaluated a range of interventions with one or more clinical, psychological or psychosocial, education or awareness or traditional or faith-based components, and were delivered by either mental health specialists or non-specialist health workers. Ten of the 12 included studies reported significant, positive effects on a range of outcomes (including functioning, symptoms and stigma). Nearly half of the interventions were based out of health facilities. Based on quality appraisals, confidence in these studies' findings is only rated low to medium.Further research is needed to develop and evaluate interventions that meet the diverse needs of people with psychosis, within and beyond the health sector.

Authors & Co-authors:  Hunt Abdurahman Omobowale Afolayan Munetsi Dzapasi Mokaya Koroma Barrie Ogunmola Koroma Shakespeare Eaton Ryan

Study Outcome 

Source Link: Visit source

Statistics
Citations :  Asher L, Patel V and De Silva MJ (2017) Community-based psychosocial interventions for people with schizophrenia in low and middle-income countries: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Psychiatry 17, 355.
Authors :  14
Identifiers
Doi : 10.1017/gmh.2022.25
SSN : 2054-4251
Study Population
Male,Female
Mesh Terms
Other Terms
Africa;psychosis;schizophrenia;systematic review
Study Design
Study Approach
Country of Study
Niger
Publication Country
England