Identifying Adolescents at Highest Risk of ART Non-adherence, Using the World Health Organization-Endorsed HEADSS and HEADSS+ Checklists.

Journal: AIDS and behavior

Volume: 28

Issue: 1

Year of Publication: 2024

Affiliated Institutions:  Centre for Evidence-Based Intervention, Department of Social Policy & Intervention, University of Oxford, Barnett House, Wellington Square, Oxford, OX ER, UK. lucie.cluver@spi.ox.ac.uk. Wolfson Centre for Young People's Mental Health, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK. Centre for Evidence-Based Intervention, Department of Social Policy & Intervention, University of Oxford, Barnett House, Wellington Square, Oxford, OX ER, UK. Centre for Social Science Research, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa. UNICEF Eastern and Southern Africa Regional Office, Nairobi, Kenya. Global HIV, Hepatitis and Sexually Transmitted Infections Programmes, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. Frontline AIDS, Brighton, UK. Department of Health Studies, American University, Washington, DC, USA. Department of Global Health, Institute for Life Course Health Research, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa. Health Psychology Unit, Institute of Global Health, University College London, London, UK.

Abstract summary 

Brief tools are necessary to identify adolescents at greatest risk for ART non-adherence. From the WHO's HEADSS/HEADSS+ adolescent wellbeing checklists, we identify constructs strongly associated with non-adherence (validated with viral load). We conducted interviews and collected clinical records from a 3-year cohort of 1046 adolescents living with HIV from 52 South African government facilities. We used least absolute shrinkage and selection operator variable selection approach with a generalized linear mixed model. HEADSS constructs most predictive were: violence exposure (aOR 1.97, CI 1.61; 2.42, p < 0.001), depression (aOR 1.71, CI 1.42; 2.07, p < 0.001) and being sexually active (aOR 1.80, CI 1.41; 2.28, p < 0.001). Risk of non-adherence rose from 20.4% with none, to 55.6% with all three. HEADSS+ constructs were: medication side effects (aOR 2.27, CI 1.82; 2.81, p < 0.001), low social support (aOR 1.97, CI 1.60; 2.43, p < 0.001) and non-disclosure to parents (aOR 2.53, CI 1.91; 3.53, p < 0.001). Risk of non-adherence rose from 21.6% with none, to 71.8% with all three. Screening within established checklists can improve identification of adolescents needing increased support. Adolescent HIV services need to include side-effect management, violence prevention, mental health and sexual and reproductive health.

Authors & Co-authors:  Cluver Shenderovich Seslija Zhou Toska Armstrong Gulaid Ameyan Cassolato Kuo Laurenzi Sherr

Study Outcome 

Source Link: Visit source

Statistics
Citations :  UNAIDS . Global AIDS estimates. Geneva: UNAIDS; 2021.
Authors :  12
Identifiers
Doi : 10.1007/s10461-023-04137-6
SSN : 1573-3254
Study Population
Male,Female
Mesh Terms
Humans
Other Terms
AIDS;Adolescents;HIV;Health personnel;Mental health;Treatment
Study Design
Study Approach
Country of Study
South Africa
Publication Country
United States