Research evaluating the effectiveness of dementia interventions in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic mapping of 340 randomised controlled trials.

Journal: International journal of geriatric psychiatry

Volume: 38

Issue: 7

Year of Publication: 2023

Affiliated Institutions:  Care Policy and Evaluation Centre (CPEC), Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK. School of Graduate Studies (GS) & Institute of Policy Studies (IPS), Lingnan University, Hong Kong, Hong Kong. Epidemiological and Psychosocial Research Directorate, National Institute of Psychiatry Ramon de la Fuente Muñiz, Mexico City, Mexico. Division of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa. Department of Social Work and Social Administration, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong. Library, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK. National Institute of Geriatrics, National Institutes of Health, Mexico City, Mexico. Africa Mental Health Research and Training Foundation, Nairobi, Kenya. Division of Social Gerontology, National Ageing Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia. Faculty of Nursing, Universidad Andrés Bello, Campus Viña del Mar, Chile. Atma Jaya Catholic University of Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia. University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand. Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.

Abstract summary 

More people with dementia live in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) than in high-income countries, but best-practice care recommendations are often based on studies from high-income countries. We aimed to map the available evidence on dementia interventions in LMICs.We systematically mapped available evidence on interventions that aimed to improve the lives of people with dementia or mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and/or their carers in LMICs (registered on PROSPERO: CRD42018106206). We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published between 2008 and 2018. We searched 11 electronic academic and grey literature databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL Plus, Global Health, World Health Organization Global Index Medicus, Virtual Health Library, Cochrane CENTRAL, Social Care Online, BASE, MODEM Toolkit) and examined the number and characteristics of RCTs according to intervention type. We used the Cochrane risk of bias 2.0 tool to assess the risk of bias.We included 340 RCTs with 29,882 (median, 68) participants, published 2008-2018. Over two-thirds of the studies were conducted in China (n = 237, 69.7%). Ten LMICs accounted for 95.9% of included RCTs. The largest category of interventions was Traditional Chinese Medicine (n = 149, 43.8%), followed by Western medicine pharmaceuticals (n = 109, 32.1%), supplements (n = 43, 12.6%), and structured therapeutic psychosocial interventions (n = 37, 10.9%). Overall risk of bias was judged to be high for 201 RCTs (59.1%), moderate for 136 (40.0%), and low for 3 (0.9%).Evidence-generation on interventions for people with dementia or MCI and/or their carers in LMICs is concentrated in just a few countries, with no RCTs reported in the vast majority of LMICs. The body of evidence is skewed towards selected interventions and overall subject to high risk of bias. There is a need for a more coordinated approach to robust evidence-generation for LMICs.

Authors & Co-authors:  Salcher-Konrad Shi Patel McDaid Astudillo-García Bobrow Choy Comas-Herrera Fry Knapp Leung Lopez-Ortega Lorenz-Dant Musyimi Ndetei Nguyen Oliveira Putra Vara Wong Naci

Study Outcome 

Source Link: Visit source

Statistics
Citations :  Abbafati C, Abbas KM, Abbasi-Kangevari M, et al. Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet. 2020;396(10258):1204-1222. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30925-9
Authors :  22
Identifiers
Doi : 10.1002/gps.5965
SSN : 1099-1166
Study Population
Male,Female
Mesh Terms
Humans
Other Terms
LMIC;dementia;evidence;global south;health policy;low- and middle-income;psychosocial interventions;systematic review;traditional Chinese medicine
Study Design
Study Approach
Country of Study
Kenya
Publication Country
England